Many people go ballistic at the very mention of Neale Donald Walsch, the author of “Conversations With God.” In 1995 Walsch wrote a book about his private conversations with God, i.e. Walsch asked God questions and God replied as a voice in Walsch’s mind. Walsch wrote down both the questions and the answers as they were happening, or so he claims. Through Walsch, “God” thereby explains the meaning and purpose of life and what God does and does not do in regard to humans.
I started reading this book some months ago, got through the first three chapters and gave up. Although I agreed with a lot of it, I decided Walsch’s God was a bit too flaky for me. Furthermore, he sounded like a Democrat. No thanks.
However, I’ve decided to give the book another look. A book that causes that much anger over one’s concept of God must be worth reading. I have decided to read the book in its entirety, underline passages that I agree with and also those I do not agree with. I will then write a comprehensive review of Walsch’s book. It won’t be a hit job, but it won’t be a whitewash either. Since I am not a member of any organized religion, I have no ax to grind. Walsch is not the first by any means to invent his own religion and so it pays to be skeptical. Many invented religions turn out to be weird cults or scams (or both).
Why do people invent religions and why do others follow them? L. Ron Hubbard, the creater of Scientology, was quoted as saying that “Writing for a penny a word is ridiculous. If a man really wants to make a million dollars, the best way would be to start his own religion.” If you invent your own religion and convince others that you are a prophet, you reap the rewards of both power and money.
Last night, desperate for something to watch on TV and finding little due to the writer’s strike, I tuned into an episode of South Park, “Trapped In The Closet.” This is the cartoon show of grade school kids in Colorado, i.e. Kyle, Cartman, Kenny and Stan. Stan takes a Scientology test and is identified by the Church of Scientology as “the reincarnation of L. Ron Hubbard.” The show describes the beliefs of Scientologists as set down by the Prophet Hubbard, and those beliefs are pretty bizarre, to say the least. In fairness, I would have to say that they are only slightly more weird than the beliefs of Mormons. Before there was L. Ron Hubbard, there was Joseph Smith. No matter what fantastic stories a “prophet” might create, there will always be some who will believe and follow.
At the end of the show, Stan disavows his prophethood to an assembly of believers. He says, “We all want so much to know who we are and where we come from that sometimes we’ll believe just about anything.” Well said, Stan. It’s a good point to remember as I begin Walsch’s book.
4 responses so far ↓
johnnypeepers // December 28, 2007 at 2:10 pm |
Good post. I started reading Walsh’s “Relevations” book a few days ago. I agree with many of his views, but I do not like cult-like figures to co-opt such universal concepts.
Scoentologists scare me. Check out XenuTV.com some time. They force their followers to put filter software on their computers so they will not find out that the CoS is a fraud designed to empty their bank accounts or use their slave labor.
Gary // December 28, 2007 at 2:32 pm |
Thanks Johnny. Scientologists scare me too. I’ll check out XenuTV and see what it’s all about.
Yes, Walsch does co-opt some universal concepts; he is not the creator of much of this revelation, but is merely copying what he’s read elsewhere.
Update: I did check out XenuTV.Com and it linked me to a good film on Scientology called “The Bridge,” at Google. I am watching it now.
Joel Gunz // February 1, 2008 at 5:54 pm |
As a former Jehovah’s Witness, I can tell you that if you take Tom Cruise’s recent video circulating the YouTube-sphere and replace “Watchtower” and “Jehovah’s Witness” for “Scientology,” you have pretty much the same thing. There are too many similarities between the two religions.
Gary // February 1, 2008 at 10:25 pm |
Joel, the Jehovah’s Witnesses were one of my obsessions a few years ago, since I have relatives in that cult. It is a very weird and destructive cult for sure. The no blood transfusions thing particularly bothers me because many kids have died because of it.